![]() I think the former is true, but the latter is way off the mark. Some folks think that BPMN is good enough for IT and it should be good enough for business professionals. ![]() Jim Sinur asserts that BPMN is demanding too much from the business people: BPMN for business professionals is just not up to a business level of need. But many analysts think that such an enhanced execution support makes the language too complex for business users. BPMN 2.0 has introduced a lot of constructs allowing to directly define process execution and as a result has been adopted by several vendors as a run-time language for BPM. ![]() One of the ways to ensure such cooperation is the development of the Business Process Management Notation (BPMN), which is supposed to be a process definition language shared between IT and business. Many publications have established that one of the main prerequisites for success of the Business Process Management (BPM) undertakings is close cooperation between business and IT.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |